Information About Canon PowerShot A3000 IS 10 MP Digital Camera with 4x Optical Image Stabilized Zoom and 2.7-Inch LCD

Canon PowerShot A3000 IS 10 MP Digital Camera with 4x Optical Image Stabilized Zoom and 2.7-Inch LCD

Canon PowerShot A3000 IS 10 MP Digital Camera with 4x Optical Image Stabilized Zoom and 2.7-Inch LCD facts, useful information along with costumer reviews who currently bought plus best price with very good discount.

Now, I’m not going to tell you that you can take better photographs with a point and shoot camera than you can with an DIGITAL SLR. But, I’m never going to notify you that you cannot take good photographs with them either. If a point and shoot has an aperture priority, shutter priority, or a tutorial shooting mode, you will have some pretty good control over the particular image will look like. But, even if it doesn’t have custom shooting modes, you can still get favorable results. After all, there are groups of photographers that pride themselves on getting great photographs using only their cellular phone cameras.

This item produced by Canon become one of the top recomended Point and Shot Camera since a lot of buyers happy after using this product. In addition to its features, the best price also becomes a factor. Below is a review of Canon PowerShot A3000 IS 10 MP Digital Camera with 4x Optical Image Stabilized Zoom and 2.7-Inch LCD, an item loved by buyers and have plenty of beneficial reviews. We will give you customer reviews, product features, descriptions, and a variety of other interesting things. Happy reading.

Canon PowerShot A3000 IS 10 MP Digital Camera with 4x Optical Image Stabilized Zoom and 2.7-Inch LCD Details and Reviews

Canon PowerShot A3000 IS 10 MP Digital

  • Amazon Sales Rank: #9084 in Camera & Photo
  • Size: ultra-compact
  • Color: Black, Silver
  • Brand: Canon
  • Model: A3000IS
  • Number of items: 1
  • Dimensions: 2.28″ h x 1.10″ w x 3.82″ l, .36 pounds
  • Display size: 2.7

Estimated Price: Buy or See Best Price

532 of 546 people found the following review helpful.
5Excellent Value
By bibliobob
For serious photography, I prefer a big, heavy digital SLR. But where my goal is not photography but I want a camera along for snapshots, I use this.

I expected to buy a Lumix LX-series or Canon S95 – both attempts to match the capabilities of a SLR as much as possible in an easily-pocketable camera. But as I kept reading the reviews I got more confused, until I remembered the basic laws of physics haven’t been repealed.

To roughly summarize the camera review sites, all major-brand subcompacts do a good job in bright light. The differentiators are low light, flash, performance, and manual control. And when you read carefully, you realize there’s not a lot of practical difference here either. But there’s no way to compare them without exaggerating the differences, which makes them sound more significant than they really are.

In low light, digital cameras increase the ISO, which means the weak signal coming from the sensor is amplified. This also amplifies noise, which causes an overall grainy look and, in dark areas, colored confetti. I don’t expect any camera to work well in low light; this goes for pro-level DSLRs and film cameras as well. So paying extra for a camera that’s really bad in low light rather than terrible doesn’t make a lot of sense to me. It’s a lot like choosing sunglasses based on their performance in dim light, or a screwdriver for its ability to drive a nail.

For flash, a commercial photographer typically uses a power pack that may draw 15 amps AC and power multiple heads which range in size from 4″ diameter to over 36″. Subcompact cameras have ridiculously small batteries and tiny flash tubes (typically under 0.2 sq inches) located at the worst possible place: near the lens. It amazes me that any of them work as well as they do. Do I really care that one extends to 13 feet and another only 11.75? There have been times where I’d wished for a more powerful flash, but I’m thinking an extra 30 feet; I wouldn’t notice an extra 2 or 3.

The A3000 flash will synch any ordinary slave flash if you turn off the red-eye feature in the camera. It won’t meter it, however, so it’s easy to wash out the picture. I believe this is true for all Canon subcompacts.

When prefocused, picture-to-picture processing time is barely noticeable — less than half a second. When you include focusing time, less than 2.5 seconds. It’s faster with the continuous shot option, which does not refocus between exposures. This is respectable, and more than enough for my needs. To keep up with a very active child or pet, you might want faster performance. Tested with 4 GB Lexar Platinum II 9MB/sec SDHC.

I use manual control on my SLR most of the time. I had it on my last two subcompacts, and seldom used it. The A3000 doesn’t have it. The only time I missed it was using slave flash. If I’m out with the family, I don’t want to be thinking like a photographer, so the camera will probably make better decisions. And manual control is less convenient on a subcompact because of the ergonomic compromises necessary for such a small camera. Nice to have, but as processors get smarter, less important.

The best professional color printers print 90,000 dots per square inch. That means it takes 4 x 6 x 90,000 = 2.2 megapixels for a 4 x 6 print. 5 x 7 = 3.2 megapixels. 8 x 10 = 7.2 megapixels. Higher megapixels increase image file size and shot-to-shot delay (while the camera compresses the image and writes it out to the card). The only advantage to “higher resolution” than that required for your final print: you can crop the picture a bit without losing any picture quality. The A3000 is 10 meg; if they had a 6 meg version, it would be a better camera. Canon knows this; they also know megapixels are a lot easier to sell.

Bigger is better, but more important than sensor size is pixel size – the larger the pixels the higher the dynamic range, which means more detail in very bright and very dark areas. It usually means better low-light performance and less noise because of other engineering choices available because of the larger pixels.

The difference in sensor size between this and some of the more expensive small cameras (S95) seems significant until you put it into perspective. The pixel size of a Canon S95 is 6% that of a 12-meg professional DSLR (FX format). A3000 is 4%. Given the dynamic range and low-light performance of a pro DSLR isn’t that great, I don’t see any reason to pay a premium for 6% vs 4%.

My ideal small camera – pocketable, usably large viewfinder (I can accept a smaller LCD), 5-6 megapixels, manual control, image stabilization (small cameras are hard to hold steady), not cluttered with silly features – is no longer made. If a camera manufacturer wants me to spend more, they’re going to have to come closer to that; more megapixels won’t do it.

Until then, I’m OK with the A3000. Pictures are excellent for a subcompact. Flash even in a big room is more than acceptable for on-camera flash, focus is quick and remarkably adept at identifying the right subject, image stabilization works as well as I’d hoped. Controls are well laid out and intuitive. LCD is bright and clear, even outdoors. The shutter release could be more prominent, and I may attach a thin rubber disk to make it easier to find by feel.

The A3000 doesn’t looking expensive, so subjects tend to ignore it. And I’m more likely to take it along because it if gets damaged or lost, or encounters the uneconomical-to-repair “lens error” that seems to afflict all brands, it’s not a big deal. Manual is pdf file on disk, also available on-line. Camera made in Malaysia. 1-year limited warranty.

7 July 2011 UPDATE: The “excellent value” comment was based on a selling price of under $100 directly from Amazon.

79 of 80 people found the following review helpful.
By Ed Hooks, Acting for Animators
Purchased the camera for my wife, who was going to Thailand on a University trip. She came back with 500+ photos, taken in all kind of light conditions. All except two or three were in sharp focus, and the best of the lot are good enough to put on the wall. She had to recharge the battery once a week, she says. We uploaded her photos to our computers, no problem. I would recommend this for any casual photographer, including the one that is technically challenged.

85 of 92 people found the following review helpful.
4A3000 IS Review
By G. Chris
I’ve owned over countless Canon/Sony models over the decade but just want to give a heads up since this is a new model and I wanted to give my opinion first.
I just got this today. Very cheap feel…camera feels very hollow and light. Pictures are great as usual from Canon. Not as many functions as my SD940 but a good point and shoot for the price. The right corner nob is a new twist for Canon ELPH models which looked weird at first but fast if you want to switch shooting modes (compared to my SD940). The thickness could be more compact given that the camera feels so light and hollow inside. The buttons need to be more crisp but its the pictures what matters most. Overall, decent camera for the money. If I had to buy again for the same price, I would go with the SD1200 which is more solid and compact.

Features of this product

  • 10.0 megapixels, 4x optical zoom, and built-in Optical Image Stabilizer
  • Lithium-ion battery makes the camera lighter and offers an easy alternative to recharge
  • New scene modes, including Super Vivid and Poster Effect; Smart Auto selects from 18 predefined shooting situations
  • Large, bright 2.7-inch LCD
  • Capture images to SD/SDHC memory cards (not included)

Trying to find a photographer for a number of years, more than I care to take into account, right from the days and nights of the Brownie, the Polaroid and had always recently been a film user until fairly recently. In my every day job, I actually use Nikon DSLR digital cameras, but every now and then I realize something I actually would like to capture once i don’t have these bulky cameras to palm. I decided it was time to buy myself an area and shoot camera. Which to buy? Right now there are so many on the market, as we all know, and is actually confusing.

That’s the whole thing you have to know about this product. With this kind of comprehensive input, you will definitely get plenty of guideline so there’s not really a single chance to make wrong decision. Don’t forget that best valued one isn’t always be the most affordable one. Price won’t be a problem when it meets your decision. Off course, you’re the someone to decide in case your choice for this product is a no, we have reviews for the next products from the same category. There’s possibility you’ll find things you need from one of them. Thank you and also have a fantastic day!

Related Post "Information About Canon PowerShot A3000 IS 10 MP Digital Camera with 4x Optical Image Stabilized Zoom and 2.7-Inch LCD"