Cheap Fujifilm X-M1 Compact System 16MP Digital Camera with 3-Inch LCD Screen – Body Only (Silver)

Fujifilm X-M1 Compact System 16MP Digital Camera with 3-Inch LCD Screen - Body Only (Silver)

Fujifilm X-M1 Compact System 16MP Digital Camera with 3-Inch LCD Screen – Body Only (Silver) specifications, exciting information and costumer opinions who previously ordered plus best price together with quite great discount.

A Mirrorless Interchangeable Lens Camera (MILC) is a digital system camera that facilitates multiple lenses while mentioned before the mirror reflex optic viewfinder featured on an SLR. It is now a popular choice especially among recreational photographers upgrading from point and shoot cameras. The first mirrorless camera was introduced in 2008. Since then it has evolved greatly in the design and features offered, moving towards the better.

This item made by Fujifilm become one of the great Mirrorless Camera since a lot of shoppers happy after using this product. In addition to its features, the best price also becomes a factor. This article is a review about Fujifilm X-M1 Compact System 16MP Digital Camera with 3-Inch LCD Screen – Body Only (Silver), an item more liked by buyers and have a lot of positive reviews. We will give you customer reviews, product features, descriptions, and a variety of other interesting things. Happy reading.

Fujifilm X-M1 Compact System 16MP Digital Camera with 3-Inch LCD Screen – Body Only (Silver) Details and Reviews

Fujifilm X-M1 Compact System 16MP

  • Amazon Sales Rank: #15888 in Camera & Photo
  • Size: none
  • Color: Silver
  • Brand: Fujifilm
  • Model: 16390392
  • Released on: 2013-07-29
  • Dimensions: 2.62″ h x 1.54″ w x 4.60″ l, .73 pounds
  • Battery type: Lithium Ion
  • Display size: 3

eligible for FREE Shipping on orders over $35.

Estimated Price: $499.00 Buy or See Best Price

310 of 319 people found the following review helpful.
4Excellent – this camera should cost more.
By A. Shrestha
Update (1 Year):
After 1 year of use, I have to warn people about one thing:
(1) The Fuji X-Trans sensor/engine tends to smear details in skin tones. Skin can look very “smeared” almost like plastic. This makes me hesitant to use it for any important events where the primary subject would be people.

Shooting RAW eliminates the smeared skin details, but then I have to spend time massaging files in Lightroom, and RAW files are around ~32mbs each. At that size, I’d rather shoot D810 RAW files.

So, for the price, my X-M1 is relegated to travel snapshots. I still enjoy using it with the Q menu because it’s so flexible and easy to change settings on the fly. But anytime people are the main subject, I will not pick the X-M1 as my first choice.

(Side note: because of the X-Trans sensor’s tendency to smear details in skin, I returned the X100s since I already had the X-M1 for travel. I also reduced the rating to 4-stars because of this shortcoming.)

—- END 1 Year UPDATE —-

First Impressions:
The Fuji X-M1 is an excellent camera. As the cheapest Fuji interchangeable lens camera, I was looking at the X-M1 as an introduction into the Fuji X system. This Fuji APS-C X sensor receives a lot of hype, and this camera does not disappoint. The build quality seems good and feels durable. The overall size with the kit lens is also much smaller than I had initially thought from pictures.

Out of camera JPEGS (with some slight tweaks) are very good. I’m glad that I don’t have to spend as much time massaging RAW files in Lightroom.

If you’re considering the following cameras, I think the X-M1 is better than the following:
* Olympus E-PM2, E-PL5.
* Fuji X20
* Sony NEX-F3, NEX-3N, NEX-6
* Panasonic GF5

The OM-D E-M5 has some unique features that may make it better for you (exceptionally good IBIS, weather sealing, EVF).

+ EXCELLENT out of camera JPGs
+ EXCELLENT control using dual dials
+ Useful Q menu
+ Easy to use regular menu
+ Good build quality
+ Fast focusing
+ Good fill-flash
+ Tiltable bounce flash
+ Fast operation
+ Customizable (I’ll cover some tips later in the review)
+ Tilt Screen that can still be seen in sunlight
+ Small size
+ Custom settings on the mode dial

– WiFi apps don’t allow control of the camera
– WiFi is pretty poor on both Android and IPhone.
– No sweep panorama
– No built in level (c’mon Fuji – this camera BEGS for a horizontal level)

Recommended Tips and tweaks:
* For faster AF, set the AF box size to the maximum and turn off the AF assist light.
* I recommend setting Sharpening +1 in any film mode.
* Fuji allows you to specify your tone curve. I prefer the flat look so I set Shadows -1, Highlights 0.
* If you want punchy, contrasty images, set Shadows +2, Highlights +2.
* For creamy noise free images to share on Facebook, set Noise Reduction to +2
* Be careful with Auto-ISO and DR. Auto-ISO at 6400 is useable, but DR400 will introduce noise into shadows. I stick to ISO3200 with DR200, or ISO 6400 with DR100.
* WiFi: Manual setup for PC Autosave is easier than “Simple” setup. I couldn’t get “Simple” to work. “Manual” worked just fine.
* WiFi: If you use the Android app, remember you must follow the instructions on the camera EXACTLY. The modes are not interchangeable. Otherwise, the camera won’t be able to connect to your device. I think Fuji can fix this and make their app more ‘robust’.

Recommended settings:
* Portraits: Astia, Sharpening +1, Shadows -1, Highlights 0, Colors 0, Auto ISO 3200, DR200
* Landscape: Velvia, Sharpening +1, Shadows 0, Highlights 0, Colors +1, ISO 400, DR200
* Everyday: Provia, Sharpening +1, Shadows 0, Highlights 0, Colors 0, Auto ISO 3200, DR200
* Dramatic B&W: BW, Sharpening +1, Shadows +2, Highlights +2, EV Comp -2/3, Auto ISO 3200, DR200

vs. Sony NEX (NEX-F3 and NEX-6)
The Fuji X-M1 blows the NEX series away. Focusing on the Fuji is faster and far more accurate. The NEX-6 focuses faster than the NEX-F3, but both are still slow compared to the Fuji X-M1. Even more important, the NEX has a tendency to focus on the wrong thing. What I mean is, you can have people in the foreground (the subject) and the NEX will choose to focus on the trees in the background. I have no idea why. The NEX-6 has a very nice EVF which the X-M1 does not have. The NEX-F3 (and replacement NEX-3N) allow you to flip the screen 180 degrees for ”selfies”. The Fuji menu is significantly easier to navigate and the Q menu makes it quick to change settings, if you need to. [As a side note, the NEX menu is incredibly frustrating for advanced users. Options are under submenus, and you need to get back to the root level to change into submenus. Furthermore, if you customise your camera buttons in PASM, those customizations don’t carry into some of the other modes, like auto mode. So when you switch modes, the experience of using the camera is frustratingly inconsistent. You’ll find that the buttons you customized have reverted back to their default settings. I couldn’t tolerate it.]

The NEX does have very nice Auto, Intelligent Auto, and Superior Auto modes which make it easy for beginners. But for advanced users, I would recommend the X-M1 over the NEX.

vs. Micro Four Thirds (u43)
I highly recommend the Fuji X-M1 over *most* of the u43 cameras. It’s significantly better than than the E-PL5 and GF5. However, the newer Olympus u43 cameras (OM-D E-M5, E-PL5, E-PM2, and E-P5) have very fast autofocus. In outdoors bright light, the X-M1 is nearly as fast. In indoor low light, the Olympus is significantly faster. Keep in mind that the Fuji X-M1 is still faster than the NEX in both conditions. The X-M1 beats the u43 is in image quality. The GF5 shots were only useable up to ISO800, and I recommend shooting at ISO400 or lower. The E-PL5, I kept to ISO1600. The X-M1 can easily go to ISO6400 with better quality. Although the E-PL5 and GF5 have touch screens, I find that I don’t miss it. I had too many accidental shots with the touch screen enabled on the E-PL5, so I usually turn the touch screen off. Note that Olympus has a fantastic touch to shoot feature that makes it great for stealthy street shooting if you tilt the LCD up. For people who really want a touch-to-shoot touchscreen, nothing can beat the Olympus.

The Olympus cameras also tend to produce a very “yellow” image in indoor tungsten light. The Fuji colors are much more natural and realistic. In outdoor light, the Olympus is fine.

However, if budget is important, keep in mind that you can buy an E-PM2 or E-PL5 with Olympus 45mm f.18 for the same price as the X-M1. The Olympus combo will allow you take wonderful street “cinematic” shots or portraits of your friends and family.

If budget isn’t a concern, I recommend the X-M1.

vs. OM-D E-M5
This deserves its own subsection because the OM-D is an excellent camera that can do things that many other camera’s cant. First, the OM-D has the best IBIS of any manufacturer. The E-PL5 IBIS, Canon IS, Nikon VR, Sony IS, and Fuji IS can’t compare. The OM-D 5-axis IBIS is so good, it allows you to do things that you simple can’t do with another camera. You can take handheld “macro” (close focus on the kit lens) video. You can shoot sharp images at 1/2 second, and relatively sharp at 1 second. Seriously. It’s THAT good. That’s why I can’t say with certainty that the X-M1 is decisively better than the OM-D. The OM-D AA filter is relatively week, and you can get very sharp shots. This is especially evident when used with a quality lens like the Olympus 45mm f1.8 or Panasonic 25mm f1.4. Furthermore, the OM-D can be easily customized (you can even directly control your curves!) and the kit lens 12-50mm has a built in function button that allows you to set it to do useful things like 2x zoom. So in one lens, you can have 12-100mm (with 35 film equivalent of 24mm – 200mm). That’s impressive.

Plus, the OM-D E-M5 has weather sealing. Although I don’t use my cameras in inclement weather, it was nice knowing that the beach, dust, and rain didn’t affect the OM-D.

Although the X-M1 can produce better image quality than the OM-D, the OM-D has so many features, that it needs serious consideration. The IBIS is amazing and will allow you to do things that you simply can’t do with other cameras.

Between the OM-D and the X-M1, I don’t know if the X-M1 is decisively a better camera. It’s better in some ways and the OM-D is significantly better in other ways. I would recommend that anyone shopping for a u43 camera should consider the OM-D. Yes, it’s much more expensive, but it’ll give you so much flexibility and opportunity to do things that you normally wouldn’t be able to do. Plus, the OM-D is built very well – it feels like small Tokina tank.

vs. Fuji X20
I wasn’t impressed with the Fuji X20. I returned it. The small sensor didn’t produce good enough results and I felt it was only good to ISO800. The focusing was equivalently fast between the X20 and X-M1, maybe slightly faster in the X-M1. For a few hundred dollars more, the X-M1 is clearly the better buy. For a pocketable camera, the Sony RX100 I/II is probably a better camera than the X20. (I never owned an RX100 though).

I recommend the X-M1 or RX100 for slightly more money.

Keep in mind that DSLRS can do things that the mirrorless cameras simply can’t do (yet). Continuous focusing on a DSLR is much better than even the single shot focusing on the OM-D. If you want to take pictures of moving subjects, you need a DSLR. That being said, some entry level DSLRs (ie: Canon T3i, Nikon D3200) don’t have as much direct control via dual dials as the X-M1. I’m not going to debate DSLR vs mirrorless cameras in this review – both have their advantages.

The main benefit of the entry level DSLR is that they are more affordable; and paired with a cheap prime like a 50mm 1.8 or Nikon’s 35mm 1.8, can teach you a lot about aperture and depth of field. You’ll need to spend much more on Fuji’s system to be able to do something similar. Overall, I think a DSLR offers a better introduction into photography.

vs. D90
You’ll need to get a D90 (or better, like the D7000 or D7100) to get dual dials. (Sorry, I don’t know the equivalent Canon range). The JPGS from the X-M1 are better than the out of camera JPGs from the D90. I only use the D90 up to ISO1600 and even that requires extra work with DFine after Lightroom. The X-M1 can go to ISO6400 with better quality. The X-M1 requires fewer tweaks then the D90 in Lightroom.

vs. D600
85mm on an FX camera is beautiful. The X-M1 can’t replace something like a D600.

Overall vs. the competition
If you’re considering an NEX or u43 kit, keep in mind that neither those nor the X-M1 are pocketable. You’ll likely carry those cameras in a bag. If you want something truly pocketable, you’re probably better off looking at an RX100. So if you’ll be using a bag anyways, I would recommend the X-M1 over the NEX or any of the smaller u43 cameras.

I hope this review helps you decide on the X-M1. Enjoy the camera!

– Avi

76 of 83 people found the following review helpful.
4Awesome camera, with some downsides for those coming from DSLRs
By A. Gupta
Background and context:

I currently own an old Canon DSLR – 1000D or similar – and had it for four plus years. So since last year I have been hunting for a replacement, one which lets me overcome the limitations of the current camera (more of that in a minute), leverages my investments in canon line-up (specifically: EF 17-40mm L, EF 50mm 1.8, EX 460 flash).

I will go through my experiments/purchases, coming from a DSLR user, share how did I end up buying the X-M1 .. and what I think about it

What was I looking for:

1. Shooting in low light – my current camera maxed out at a sort-of unusable 1600 ISO. I bought a flash and learnt how to bounce it etc – but with new cameras and capabilities, the point of flash in casual settings became less and less frequent.
2. I gained a decent bit of expertise on using manual controls – using AEV, aperture and shutter settings – and getting delicious bokeh. So advanced controls was another thing I wanted in my new camera.
3. Video capabilities: I saw sample videos of DSLR cameras – and wanted to be able to take videos with the bokeh in the background, and do low light videography with high image quality
4. More resolution: In-spite of what other people say about resolution – I like to blow up the image and look at it – admire tiny details that might be missed in the overall shot when looked on the overall photo. Obviously this depends on the shot.. but my 10MP felt limiting
5. Good image quality with JPEGs: I didn’t know I felt I needed better quality at first other that low light – but didnt want to loose image quality. That said – I dont do RAW conversions – and I know I am probably not going to do it in the future either.
6. Compactness: This came in as a later requirement – when I started noticing that I would use my phone more and more, and DSLR less and less – since it just was too bulky to take around people’s places or trekking. That said – initially compactness was not on top of my list
7. Compatibility with my Canon equipment: I have made a bit of investment from my perspective in Canon EF equipment from last several years – nice flash 460 EX II, EF 17-40mm F4.0 L, and my first prime – 50mm f1.8. Plus B+W MRC filters. So to me Canon was the company to go for
8. Sturdiness: I have dropped my DSLR a few times on hard surface, gone to beach-side, been in light drizzles – and that thing keeps on clicking away. Want my next one to be similarly sturdy since I seem to be getting clumsier with age.

What have I tried thus far:

I waited for a few years for a good camera. I didnt want the EOS T4i / 60D since they used the old sensor – in general if sticking with Canon – why not go full-frame, right?

So I got a EOS 6D with 24-105mm F4.0 L lens plus another full frame zoom. That thing took very nice shots – the smoothness of the image and tone of color was amazing. However, the camera system was immense, esp with three lenses to carry around, and that multiplied with the complexity – resulted in my not using the camera to even part of the potential.

The next camera I eagerly waited for was 60d’s replacement – hoping for something that is sturdy and takes amazing pictures. I got the 70d soon after it was released, and tried it a bit. The camera felt better than my current camera, though nowhere as good as 6D, and images were just plain ordinary. So – returned that.

Why the XM1:

I have followed a lot of photo sites in the last several years. Steve digicams, stevehuffphoto, dpreview, dxomarks, kenrockwell… they all have different perspectives and preferences. But the Fuji X system seemed to come across as a good one to look at. I couldnt find sensor or lens ratings at DXO for the fuji system – but dpreview had great sensor ratings for jpegs, and stevehuffphoto and other sites had a lot of reviews. Many of them talked about the compactness as much as the image quality. Focus speed was an issue mentioned in all of them – so it is something I had to come to terms with.

The tough thing about the XM1 or XE1 was – there was no camera available to try out and see. Meant I had to buy it and try it out. After returning the 70d, I pretty much became open to trying out something new and compact. Along came XM1 with decent rating in dpreview, plastic body with a new cheap lens and reasonable price.

Initial impressions of XM1:

I have had it for several days now – here are my initial thoughts. Note that I will keep comparing it to Canon DSLRs time to time – though I will try to give stand-alone information on XM1 at the same time.

Handling: This camera is small and tough to hold in one hand – esp if you are coming from DSLR. There is no grip, and the plastic is a bit slippery. Even compared to point and shoot – it is tough to hold because you have the big kit lens to balance. Holding with two hands is required.

Viewfinder/screen: It obviously comes with the screen – and there is no viewfinder. That screen takes getting used to – the screen is a bit tight to manipulate and so far I have not found it as easy to move etc like say a camcorder or even the flippy screens on other cameras. The screen itself is nice and bright, and comes with good options for what kind of information would you like to see on it

Control: I am a guy – so won’t read a manual – right :). Kidding aside – controls is one place that this camera is still taking a little getting used to. E.g. on P mode – how do I adjust shutter and aperture; how do I change shutter speed in movies; where was the ISO again; how do I go back to viewing pictures if I zoomed out.. This may be a factor of me learning new things when moving from DSLR, but definitely not very intuitive to operate.

OIS: The OIS works ok but not great. I consider myself a steady hand – taking photos from my hand with my DSLR with kit lens OIS with exposures around 1/8 to 1/4 seconds (maybe even 1/2 if lucky). It is not possible with this camera. Not sure if this is an OIS issue or focus issue – the OIS does not work great with video either – there is more shake when making video in this camera than Canon 6D with EF24-105 F4.0L.

Focus: Not easy to do perfectly – that’s one thing I can say without sounding negative. Not having a viewfinder, and instead a small green box in the screen – takes some getting used to. The focusing itself takes time – maybe fraction of a second depending on light. It is not easy to just move quickly and take a snap – the subject has to be a little still to get a decent shot. Where to focus has also been challenging – I try to shoot a subject, but it ends up focusing on the wall painting behind. Learning to focus with this system is going to be important to getting usable shots – it is definitely way tougher to use for me than a DSLR.

Wifi: The software etc is not very friendly. On the canon – using the wifi was easy – not so here. I just use the card now. Seriously Fuji – please do a firmware and software update to get this right.

Compactness: It is tiny coming from DSLRs. Very easy to pack – though not pocketable with the zoom lens. Still – taking photos of people suddenly is not a scary thing for them. A compact holster for XM1 will be very handy – will search for it.

Sturdiness: Not tried it so far. Doesn’t feel very sturdy though – I am not sure if it will survive a fall onto hard surface. So I bought an accident protection plan.

Image quality: You might be thinking – why has he given it 4 stars. This section is the reason. The image quality is worlds apart from my existing DSLR. Not surprising – since I am using a 4 year old camera with kit lens. But even then – it was a huge improvement from my original DSLR. Not just that, it is also better than the photos shot from the 70d (outdoor, indoor) which was double the price. The colors, tones, are just amazing. In fact, the quality was almost on par with the 6D with the kit L lens. Quality referred here is my own non technical judgement – blowing up the image and seeing each detail; looking at overall color of skin, sky, surroundings in the shot, seeing the clarity of the images at low light. Just the fact that I am comparing a ~700 dollar camera (the price I paid for the kit) with a $2500 kit and saying it is almost as good or better – should maybe explain what an awesome tool this is for capturing beautiful images. It definitely puts the other camera/kit lens combinations I tried in the same price point to shame.

These results are with the cheap plastic kit lens – this sensor has phenomenal reviews with prime lenses – so at some point I will get one or two of them (or maybe XF Zoom) and use those.

Overall – I am happy with this purchase, and while there may something to decide between this (XM1) and a camera three times its price (6D), for now I will happily use this camera.

81 of 94 people found the following review helpful.
4Good Camera But Not A Great Camera
By Peter Majerczak
After using this camera for an entire day at my brothers wedding here is my review: (Note I used a Fujifilm XF 27mm F2.8 Compact Prime Lens the whole time.) (I am not a pro, most of my pictures are taken in automatic)

Pros: Photo quality, tilt flash, great lenses available, very cool filters built in, Fn and Q buttons, start up speed.
Cons: Occasional focus issues, grip does not feel very secure, repetitive menus,

This camera feels really well built, it feels like you have something great in your hand. The grip on this camera is not all that great, the camera just does not feel secure when you are holding it. I would like to get the additional grip handle but I do not want to increase the size of this camera. Speaking of size, even with my compact lens, don’t expect to put this in any kind of pocket. I wish this camera was a little smaller. The battery on this camera lasted me most of the day, around 300 pictures. I really like the flash on this camera, you can tilt the flash up or down, so you can get very cool effects. The screen is good enough to use outdoors, and the tilt feature is great for taking overhead shots. The camera starts up quick and takes pictures very quickly as well. The pictures, when the camera manages to focus, are beautiful! I am absolutely in love with the picture quality. Well worth having compared to the drawbacks.

Update : October 5 —
So I have been shooting with this camera for a few weeks now, mainly with the 27mm lens, and I realized a few things.

Why I’m gonna keep it:
1. I love the quality of pictures, they are insanely wonderful.
2. Love some of the features – burst mode is good, Adv mode is super cool for shooting with selected colors, Q button and Fn buttons are great for switching and adjusting on the fly.
3. Wireless (once you figure it out) is cool, at a party I took a few shots and was able to send the pictures to my buddy in only a few minutes. He posted them on Facebook in no time.
4. Looks I get complements on the style of the camera and I like the look and feel now.

Why I can’t wait for the XM2 or XE2:
1. No view finder is a huge issue for me, especially since the cameras focus is terrible. I tried all focus modes and they still miss the mark. Manual mode with magnification tries really hard to correct the issue but the human eye is probably best for making sure a picture is sharp. I missed some good shots and will continue to miss shots, I’m sure.

Features of this product

  • 16.3 MP APS-C X-Trans CMOS sensor
  • ISO 200-6400 (expandable to to 12800 and 24600)
  • 1080/30fps HD video (.MOV/H.264)
  • 49-point AF
  • Up to 5.6 FPS continuous shooting
  • 3 inch tiltable LCD with 920,000 dots
  • Built-in flash with hot shoe
  • Built-in WiFi connectivity
  • Fujifilm X-Mount compatible
  • 8 Advanced Art Filters, film simulation modes, plus PSAM
  • Raw, JPEG, and Raw+JPEG
  • SD, SDHC, and SDXC memory

Mirrorless Cameras are Digital Digital cameras which provide the photo quality and versatility of professional Digital Single-Lens Reflex cameras (DSLRs), together with a mobility closer to regarding a more common “point and shoot” digital camera. They are also otherwise known as Mirrorless Interchangeable Lens Cameras simply because that, distinct from the common Digital Digital cameras for consumer market, that they provide a mechanism to change lenses conveniently, as it’s done with professional ones.

That’s all what we can present you. It is our hope that this details are useful enough that may help you find the right product to get. Price is essential but it really won’t be an issue once you really need that product. What we are advising for you is to always choose greatest one. In the event you don’t prefer the product, we are recommending you to definitely read reviews of similar product below. Thanks to you to read this review and then we are wishing you a great day.

Related Post "Cheap Fujifilm X-M1 Compact System 16MP Digital Camera with 3-Inch LCD Screen – Body Only (Silver)"