Details of Fujifilm X-Pro 1 16MP Digital Camera with APS-C X-Trans CMOS Sensor (Body Only)

Fujifilm X-Pro 1 16MP Digital Camera with APS-C X-Trans CMOS Sensor (Body Only)

Fujifilm X-Pro 1 16MP Digital Camera with APS-C X-Trans CMOS Sensor (Body Only) specifications, interesting information along with costumer reviews who already ordered and also best price along with pretty good discount.

Once deciding to buy a fresh camera or simply improving the the one which you have, there are many factors to consider. There are some fantastic makes and models of cameras available to buy, but a good steady point and shoot camera is merely as good as a digital single zoom lens camera. An average person uses their camera to consider family shots, and vacation images and though they do not really understand mega pixels, resolution and exposure, as long as their camera takes a good picture, they will be pleased with the results. The technology in a place and shoot camera is fantastic these days and nights, that they can now outperform some more expensive cameras on the market.

This item made by Fujifilm become one of the great Point and Shot Camera since a lot of purchaser fulfilled after using this product. In addition to its features, the best price also becomes a factor. This article is a description of Fujifilm X-Pro 1 16MP Digital Camera with APS-C X-Trans CMOS Sensor (Body Only), an item more liked by buyers and have plenty of beneficial reviews. We will present to you customer reviews, product features, descriptions, and a variety of other interesting things. Happy reading.

Fujifilm X-Pro 1 16MP Digital Camera with APS-C X-Trans CMOS Sensor (Body Only) Details and Reviews

Fujifilm X-Pro 1 16MP Digital Camera

  • Amazon Sales Rank: #877 in Camera & Photo
  • Size: 3.23 x 1.69 x 5.51″
  • Color: Black
  • Brand: Fujifilm
  • Model: 16225391
  • Fabric type: NON OF THE ABOVE
  • Dimensions: 3.23″ h x 1.69″ w x 5.51″ l, .99 pounds
  • Battery type: Lithium Ion
  • Display size: 3

eligible for FREE Shipping on orders over $35.

Estimated Price: $499.00 Buy or See Best Price

221 of 229 people found the following review helpful.
4Not perfect, but closest thing I’ve found to my ideal camera
By brian
I have an X-pro1 with the 35mm/f1.4 lens. (I live in Canada, and ordered it from Japan.)

Here are my overall first impressions:

If I had to sum it up, I’d say it’s not perfect, but for me it’s the closest thing to the ideal camera that I’ve found.

THE GOOD

– Image quality is beyond reproach – in terms of colour rendering, highlight/shadow detail, sharpness, quality of the bokeh.
– Feels very solid; excellent build quality
– It looks better in person than in the pictures I had seen of it
– Controls are big and easy to operate, even with gloves on
– Shutter sound is very soft & quiet
– Viewfinder is fantastic

OVERALL PERFORMANCE & SIZE

– In terms of performance, I’ll compare it to the Panasonic GF1 /w 20mm pancake, as it’s a camera I’m very familiar with. While the camera isn’t aimed at exactly the same market, both cameras fit into a similar category – they’re both alternatives to DSLRs that aim at providing excellent image quality and handling, with less bulk and weight. And many photographers fell in love with the GF1 / 20mm combo.

– Focus speed: In my experience, the X-Pro1 autofocus speed and reliability is very similar to the the GF1. While I haven’t done millisecond timing to compare them, I can say that they feel about the same in autofocus performance. So, while a good DSLR can outperform both cameras for fast action focussing, the autofocus performance is more than adequate for most other types of photography.

– Operational speed: No major issues here – startup time is definitely less than a second, and I haven’t even turned on the “quick start” mode. You can shoot quickly, and there’s no delay before you can take more shots in either single or burst modes. Again, very similar to the GF1.

– Size and weight: The X-Pro1 is obviously bigger than the GF1. I’d describe it as somewhere between the GF1 and a DSLR in size. In terms of subjective impression, the X-Pro1 isn’t quite as small and innocent looking as the GF1. Depending on who you are, this may be a good thing or a bad thing. The GF1 has the edge if you want the camera to be small, discrete and non-intimidating, while the X-Pro1 is a little more substantial in keeping with its professional target market. But what really matters when it comes to always having the camera with you, is its weight. The X-Pro1 manages to feel solid, while not feeling overly heavy. Unlike a DSLR, I wouldn’t hesitate to carry the X-Pro1 around all day, although the GF1 still has the edge in portability and ability to tuck it into a jacket pocket. From my brief experience with the X100, I’d put it somewhere between the two in this regard, but closer to the GF1.

– Manual focus: Very similar to the manual focus-by-wire of the GF1 / 20mm combo. It’s not ridiculously slow as I’ve heard the X100 was, but I’d still prefer direct mechanical manual focus.

WHAT COULD BE IMPROVED

– If there’s just one thing I’d ask for in a firmware update, it would be a central magnified area to aid manual focus. While you can magnify the whole screen by pressing the “command dial”, this is an extra step, and awkwardly takes you away from seeing the overall composition. Panasonic has gotten this right in some of their recent mirrorless cameras. I know some people like Sony’s focus peaking, and while that too would do the job, I find it ugly and suspect that Sony’s patents might make it hard for Fujifilm to copy this.

– While aperture ring has a great feel to it, actual aperture adjustment lags. This is manifest when viewing the aperture number through the viewfinder while turning the dial, and in terms of actual aperture adjustment in DOF preview mode

– Autofocus, while not loud, also isn’t silent as I’d wish it would be.

– There is no option to visually preview exposure when setting shutter speed manually

– I like the film simulation bracketing, as an option to record both a colour and black-and-white version, for easy comparison of black-and-white vs colour shots right off the bat on the computer. This mode allows you to choose which 3 film simulations you want to record, but it has a couple drawbacks. One is that it will always give you 3 versions – no options for just 2 for instance. Also, unlike single or burst mode, the camera locks up and doesn’t let you take another shot until it finishes writing.

– Exposure compensation dial does nothing after you’ve engaged AE lock.

– It would be nice to have some confirmation that the exposure compensation dial is centered. Ideally, there would be something to let you tell physically, perhaps with a bump/indent on the dial, and different feeling to the click when it returns to the 0-location, so that you can confirm without looking. Also, it would be nice if the exposure compensation indicator in the viewfinder changed color when centered, to again let you quicly confirm when it’s centered.

– The “command dial” does nothing when in the menus and other situations where it would be nice to have an alternative to pressing the arrow buttons.

158 of 163 people found the following review helpful.
4Has Impeccable image quality but also operational quirks.
By Parka
Update 27 Sep 2012: I’ve to rewrite a big portion of the review because firmware 2.0 is a rather significant improvement.

The image quality on this camera is sublime. The colours are absolutely gorgeous, mesmerizing.

It has the best image quality compared to previous cameras I’ve used, namely Canon 7D (sold), GF1, GH2 and X100. 7D is quite good, except in high ISO, relatively speaking. X-Pro1 is significantly better in image quality than the GH2, which I use frequently for videos. I’ve also borrowed an Olympus OM-D E-M5 to try out and the Olympus camera is close but the X-Pro1 is still one notch better. I’ve read that many say that E-M5 is as good as X-Pro1, but you really need to have used both to see the difference.

I don’t post-edit much with the X-Pro1 because the jpeg quality is just too good. That’s just JPEG. Since I don’t need to do post editing, I guess I’ll be shooting just JPEGs from now. I’ve read many complaints regarding the RAW files and photo software being unable to process them to the best of their potential. I can’t comment much since I don’t shoot a lot of RAW.

After a series of firmware updates, latest being 2.0, AF speed for the three prime lens have improved. The AF speed is now more satisfactory, although still not as fast as DSLR or Micro Four Thirds. I’ve two tips on even fast AF. Turn Power Save Mode off to have faster OVF AF speed. Another tip is not to pre-focus and hit the shutter all the way – the camera will get the focus most of the time.

The AF speed could be a source of frustration and potential deal breaker for many. But it comes down to what type of photography you’re into. This is not a sports camera, that’s for sure. So it’s not that suitable for shooting subjects moving faster than walking speed. It’s definitely not a general purpose do-it-all camera. Depending on what you shoot, you might actually need another camera. It’s also not a beginner’s camera, although if you’re willing to learn, you’ll learn a lot. I’m learning a lot.

Speed is quite subjective. For example on the GF1 & X100, I expected them to be slow, so their speed is satisfactory. I expected X-Pro1 to have faster AF speed, so it’s slightly unsatisfactory in that sense. But since I’m already used to the X100 speed, this again becomes satisfactory. When you consider the price, it becomes borderline satisfactory. It’s all about expectations.

Manual focus is responsive to the turn of the focus wheel. The 3x magnified view is useful as it’s large enough to see the subject clearly, but not too large as to have the subject move too much, such as when you’re using a long telephoto lens. The overall focus-by-wire implementation has improved a lot, way better than X100, almost as good as Micro Four Thirds.

Handling is excellent. All the things you need to shoot are there: the aperture ring, shutter speed dial and exposure dial. It’s taking photos at its simplest form, with no need to go into menus.

After using the camera since March 2012, I’ve had a lot of people telling me they really like the design of the camera. The design may not be as discreet as I thought. Most people are so used to seeing DSLR and P&S cameras that this rangefinder-shaped camera actually stands out as a result! I’ve also noticed that people are generally less guarded when being pointed with this camera than with big DSLRs.

So to buy or not?

In my opinion, if you’re coming from the best Micro Four Thirds camera, you’re gaining high ISO performance, colour rendition and a huge step in image quality.

If you’re coming from a heavy DSLR camera, you’re gaining high ISO performance and a lot of weight advantage.

This is a camera that challenges expectations, in the most literal sense. You’ll either love it, or hate it. I like it very much. There are still some quirks but Fujifilm has shown themselves to being able to listen to customers and release the appropriate firmwares.

5 out of 5 stars for image quality and handling.

4 out of 5 stars for everything else.

+ Excellent build quality
+ Nice weight for body (450g) and lens
+ Discreet just-a-piece-of-black design
+ Lens have aperture rings
+ Rubber hand grip works well enough
+ Exposure dial is tighter, less prone to accidental hits
+ Buttons have nice tactile feel
+ Hybrid viewfinder (OVF and EVF) works nicely
+ Sharp 3-inch LCD
+ Shutter dial has a lock at A
+ Shutter sound is soft, blends with ambient noise
+ Impeccable image quality
+ Legendary high ISO performance
+ Amazing quality JPEG at default setting
+ Auto White Balance is almost always correct
+ AF speed is satisfactory
+ Able to focus in extreme low light, although it takes more time
+ AF accuracy seems slightly improved over X100.
+ Manual focus is responsive
+ Start up is fast
+ Menus have tabs that show everything in plain sight
+ Writes as fast as your SD card can write
+ Average to good battery life. Get an extra battery.
– OVF is smaller than X100
– Not sealed. I’ve dust inside my EVF (not OVF) after 1 week.
– No way to adjust diopter
– Triangle rings causes lug wear. The ring is more durable than the lug.
– 18mm lens framelines covers less than 100%. Your photos will cover more.
– Drastic parallax adjustment for 60mm lens in OVF for closeup subjects
– Battery lid feels filmsy and placement is bad
– Shutter dial lock is not necessary – Yes, I contradict myself
– Still has slight tendency to back-focus (Shooting with EVF reduces that)
– Strangely, OVF focuses slower than EVF
– No ability to set minimum shutter speed in AutoISO
– Lacking in video settings and lens aren’t optimized for video.
– No manual aperture control during video recording
– No digital zoom during video mode (compared to X100)
– Moire effect is easy to create in video
– Video is only 24fps

FIRMWARE REQUEST

– Have the ability to set minimal shutter speed
– Ability to turn the arrow buttons into function buttons
– Ability to turn on depth of field preview ALL THE TIME. E.g. When I turn to f/8, the aperture should close down.

Update 24 April 2012:
Firmware 1.01 removed the noise from chattering aperture blades

Update 8 June 2012:
Firmware 1.1 makes manual focus easier. Images are sharper in OVF/LCD during manual focus zoom in mode.

Update 27 Sep 2012:
EVF no longer freezes while the lens autofocus. MF lag is almost gone now. The focus-by-wire MF has improved significantly and is now more responsive to the turn. A 3x magnification mode during MF is added to the original 10x and the magnified view is more useful now. Autofocus speed has improved for the three lens after the lens firmware. Auto ISO at 6400 has been added but there’s still no ability to set minimum shutter speed. Write speed has also improved.

130 of 138 people found the following review helpful.
5How Fuji stole my heart and money
By Vinay K. Sharma
WHY WHAT WHO

I chose to write this review because the reviews on Amazon are so polarizing and sometimes downright pushy, so much so that they made me buy this camera to judge it for myself. I have to admit that it has been a long time since I had to defend my spending to myself. I am sure many must have faced the same internal struggle. Let me admit that this camera is a keeper for me. The decision came after a long search for a discrete both in use and appearance camera with a image quality worth taking prints and blowups of. I didn’t personally own too many of micro four thirds, DSLRS and compacts but have friends who shared fair and clear opinion about the equipment they own(ed).

What this camera is? It’s a collection of wishes in a very ambitious package and just like any other ambitious technology firsts, suffers from lack of polished user interface as well as competition. Some might find it downright offensive but X-Pro1 does not really have a competitor and for those who own M8 and M9s you know that you are eventually going to hit that buy button on your shopping cart sooner or later. You may say what about NEX7 and O-MD? I must say, to me NEX7 seems like a very light and compact laptop running Microsoft XL to take pictures, that is to say extremely flexible, configurable and fast but requires you to dedicate your brain, hands, fingers and eyes behind a thick software interface. Hardly photography for me since it would be so hard to make mistakes both unintentional and deliberate. I haven’t touched O-MD so can’t say much about it. And then there is the IQ, yeh well.. Fuji Xs can make any photography lover’s eye go all watery but X-Ppro1 IQ can really grab on and hold on to a photographer’s soul, especially when you get it going past its many issues. Although to be fair all issues are under MY limits of acceptable.

Who is this for? I understand why the reviews are so heavily opinionated since people have different photographic needs and have certain expectations from a camera especially an expensive one like this. If you:

Do landscape photography: You’d love it.
Do portraits: You’d love it.
Do street photography: You’d love it.
Do kids photography: You’d hate it.
Do sports photography: No way, this camera is not so sporty. You’d hate it.
Do low light action photography: You’d hate it.
Do want your camera to do photography for you: You’d hate it.
Want to show off your new toy to friends: You’d hate it. It would be hard to justify the cost to them in the 10 mins they hold the camera and the red dot owners would think that you don’t know squat about photography.

So why would you go the distance to buy this camera? Just look at the images in flickr. Also it’s truly an enjoyable experience to shoot with this camera. Here are my reason why I choose to keep this camera:

THE VIEWFINDER

The OVF is not complete by itself, it’s the combination of OVF and EVF on a flick of a switch that makes this camera probably the best tool to compose great images. The bright lines and a little extra of the world that you see around them makes you think in terms of a `photograph’ you are going to take not a `scene’ you are going to capture. If you think that’s a subtle difference, just try making a frame with your hand in front of your face and see it for yourself how a frame helps you compose when you can also see around it. One suggestion is to enable the parallax adjust focus frames, so that you can avoid about 10 mins of frustration when you think that the camera can’t focus correctly. The frame lines are a bit tighter than the actual image that comes out but hopefully a fix to it is just a firmware update away. I have a 35 f1.4 and if I need to get a DOF preview, instead of enabling the function button to do that, I find it easier to switch to EVF and half press the shutter button. Needless to say my camera stays with OVF most of the time. One truly amazing thing is that OVF lets you compose your multiple exposure images, which may as well be a gimmick but is never the less very awesome to experience. The manual override to the magnifier is also sometimes useful like when I am taking images for a panoramic image. Yes I don’t like the in camera panoramic composition, I would rather use a desktop software do it.

AUTO FOCUS

I think since it is almost fashionable to say that the camera has a slow autofocus, it is possibly the reason, I am almost glad that it’s not as bad as I thought it would be. In bright situation it’s just as fast as your run of the mill SLR. It does hunt in the dark and so does MOST of the cameras. It needs high contrast objects to allow it to focus in dim light. Now I am almost encroaching on the domain of Captain Obvious. One thing that I have already mentioned that you need to enable the parallax adjusted focus frames to correctly relate to what the camera is focusing at. I don’t understand why Fuji didn’t choose to enable it by default. Some people suggested that you use the continuous autofocus to work around the so called slow autofocus but I found it rather annoying but it’s just my opinion and I DON’t think AF is terribly slow on this camera or even slow enough to be even considered a limitation of the camera system although I wouldn’t mind a firmware fix which can make it faster. Then there is accuracy. I have to admit that I don’t spend a lot on modern cameras and I still love my MF Film SLRs but the 35mm 1.4 with AF can cause serious burn in issues on my plasma TV if I ever chose to render the images 1:1 on it. No, but really you get, very very accurate focusing and extraordinarily sharp images.

SENSOR AND IQ

Does it gets rid of moire without an AA filter?, my test says not completely but you won’t see it on 99% of your images. Are the images sharp? Please check out full size images on Flickr. The noise performance is stellar. Someone mentioned on one of the forums (need to look up the link) that due to the modified sensor design Fujifilm will have to do excessive color NR which would result green or red patches on dark low contrast portions of the image and I was able to find a few of those patches but, I am guessing that can as well be a limitation of the in camera JPEG engine and possibly can be fixed with firmware updates but overall the IQ is just down right fantastic. The patches are not very obvious unless you know what you are looking for.
The film simulation modes are really what they say they are. Velvia just takes you back to those Fujifilm colors without the noise of course. As for me I don’t think I am going to miss the lack of RAW support in Lightroom but on the other hand would LOVE to have it.

LOOK AND FEEL

The camera looks stunning, even better in real than it ever looked to me in all the images on the internet. People say its not as heavy as the money they have paid for it but I really don’t intend to use it for self defence like I would if I had Leica M9 in my hand (and I would need its self defence capabilities if I had M9 in my hand). On the less humorous side, I feel the weight is perfect, does not tire me out and I feel that strap is redundant since I can carry it in my hand the whole day. Just get one of those beautiful Gordy’s straps and you are good to go.
I live near NYC on the waterfront in a little infamous place called Jersey City and the boardwalk is very touristy and I often exchange looks of people looking at what camera equipment you are carrying. I noticed that people don’t even look at my X-Pro1, which is awesome. I am sure the number of camera buffs / intersection is much higher in NYC and I might get caught but I am yet to test my theory.

The real dials to adjust aperture and shutter speed is a blessing. The shutter speed dial is a bit stiff but does have an excellent feel to it. The aperture dial feels a little too easy to turn but then you realise that you can change it with a single finger without taking your eye off the viewfinder and you catch yourself saying `damn Fuji’. Don’t know if it is luck or its by design but it’s perfect.

7 configurable settings and one Q menu to control them all, brilliant user interface, thank you Fujifilm!

The display is really good as long as you are not directly under the sun. Some say its the best in the industry but I wouldn’t know.

I have big hands so even though the camera is big and chunky, I think the grip might help.

DEAR FUJI

Here is a list of things that I would like the Fuji engineers or anyone who has some influence on them to consider when they start giving firmware updates:

1. Get rid of power save mode – this mode only makes users unhappy, instead try to reduce the cost of the spare battery.
2. Make the fly by wire manual focus logarithmic, so that I can get to the focusing distance quickly and do the finer adjustments with slower turns of the focusing ring.
3. Keep the focus detection algorithm running in manual focus mode and highlight the focus rectangles on the parts of the frame as they get in focus. Kind of like focus peaking in NEX7 but on the OVF as well. My old EOS 20D used to do it for about 30 seconds when you switch from automatic to manual focus. You may choose to run the algorithm only with the half press of shutter to save on battery life.
4. Focus confirmation with the magnifier with the loupe only partially covering the frame like in many micro four thirds and point and shoots like S90/95/100 etc.
5. When the camera is in completely manual mode, i.e. user set shutter speed, user set aperture, user set focus and user set ISO, DONT think, just take the picture.
6. More accurate framing lines on the OVF.
7. Histogram on the image preview in EVF.
8. Faster autofocus.
9. Ultrasonic motor on the future lenses.
10. I would like to have more configurability of the buttons on the camera but i am not sure if that would make it another NEX clone.

I know that is a big wish list BUT again the camera is still very good and to me its a keeper. More than anything this is the camera that inspires me to take pictures, play with different settings and be creative. At this point I am totally enjoying this camera and I hope things get better or at least stay the same with the future updates from Fujifilm.

Features of this product

  • 16.3MP APS-C “X-Trans” CMOS sensor
  • 6 frames per second continuous shooting, not suggested for moving objects
  • 49-area contrast detection AF system
  • ISO 200-6400, expandable up to 25,600,1080 HD video
  • 3.0 inch LCD with 1,230,000 dots, Hybrid optical/electronic viewfinder, Raw and Raw + JPEG shooting .Flash hotshoe, SD/SDHC/SDXC card slot

Now, I’m not going to tell you that you can take better photographs with a point and shoot camera than you can with an DIGITAL CAMERA. But, I’m never going to tell you that you aren’t take good photographs with them either. If a point and shoot has an aperture priority, shutter priority, or a manual shooting mode, you will have some pretty good control over the actual photo will look like. But, even if it doesn’t have custom shooting modes, you can still get favorable results. After all, there are groups of photographers that pride themselves on getting great photographs using only their cellphone cameras.

That’s the whole thing you must know concerning this product. With this kind of comprehensive input, you’ll receive plenty of guideline so there’s not a single possiblity to make the wrong decision. Don’t forget that best valued one isn’t be the cheapest one. Price won’t become a problem when it meets your choice. Off course, you’re the someone to decide and if your decision with this product is a no, we’ve reviews for one more products from the same category. There’s possibility you can find the thing you need derived from one of of them. Thanks and also have a great day!

Related Post "Details of Fujifilm X-Pro 1 16MP Digital Camera with APS-C X-Trans CMOS Sensor (Body Only)"