Panasonic LUMIX DMC-FZ300K 4K, Point and Shoot Camera with Leica DC Lens 24X Zoom (Black) specifications, exciting information with costumer testimonials who previously ordered and in addition best price along with pretty good discount.
When ever deciding to buy a new camera or simply updating the the one that you have, there are many factors to consider. There are some fantastic makes and models of cameras in the stores, but a good stable point and shoot camera is merely as good as a digital single zoom lens camera. An average person uses their camera for taking family shots, and holiday photographs and though they do not really understand mega pixels, resolution and exposure, as long as their camera takes a good picture, they will be pleased with the results. The technology in a place and shoot camera is fantastic these days and nights, that they can now outperform some more expensive cameras on the market.
This item produced by Panasonic become one of the top recomended Point and Shot Camera since a lot of customers satisfied after using this item. In addition to its features, the best price also becomes a factor. This article is a review about Panasonic LUMIX DMC-FZ300K 4K, Point and Shoot Camera with Leica DC Lens 24X Zoom (Black), a product loved by costumers and have plenty of positive reviews. We will present to you customer reviews, product features, descriptions, and a variety of other interesting things. Happy reading.
Panasonic LUMIX DMC-FZ300K 4K, Point and Shoot Camera with Leica DC Lens 24X Zoom (Black) Details and Reviews
50 of 53 people found the following review helpful.
This is a BIG upgrade to the FZ200
By James Strachan
I have been using this camera for a few days now and it is a BIG upgrade on the previous model. Once you have used the EVF on this model you just cannot go back to the EVF on the FZ200. Likewise, the high definition capacitive touchscreen elevates the camera to a different league alongside the Lumix G Series cameras and once you have got used to working that way it is indispensable. The same goes for the 4K photo modes, especially the pre-burst mode that allows you to take pictures of events that happened BEFORE you pressed the shutter.
Handling is virtually perfect: it has a good size and weight without being cumbersome, the 5-axis image stabilisation is much better than the anti-shake system on the FZ200 (which was already good) and it is rugged and weatherproof. It also looks very professional without being flashy.
And last but not least: the new back-side illuminated (BSI) sensor produces less noise (especially at low light levels) and higher ISO range. While the 4K UHD video mode produces pin sharp results – even at surprisingly low light levels – thanks once again to the new sensor. And the HD video modes are also extended and improved.
In short, I can highly recommend this camera to anybody looking for the perfect all-round stills and video camera and consider it a worthy successor to the fantastically popular FZ200.
72 of 80 people found the following review helpful.
Excellent camera, but no still photo upgrade: Same sensor / same lens as FZ200, weak battery life, more weight
By Randy Wakeman
In brief, the FZ300 is NO advance from the previous FZ200 in image quality, nor should it be. It has the same (excellent) lens and the same 12.1 MB MOS sensor. There is zero improvement in the sensor, for it is absolutely identical to the FZ200, and zero improvement in the lens array. The FZ300 is made in China, just as the current FZ200 production is. Original FZ200’s were made in Japan.
What it adds (aside from extra weight) is “splash-proofing,” a better EVF, better LCD, and 4K video. These “features” may be more than enough to satisfy many, but the image quality is essentially the same as the FZ200. There is no basis for fabulously better images and, quite unsurprisingly, it does not produce them. It would take a bigger (or somehow better) sensor (and a larger or somehow ‘better’ lens) for that, and it has neither.
The negatives are the extra weight, bulk, and cost vs. the FZ200. The battery life has also tanked on the FZ300 . . . down to a CIPA 380 shots from the FZ200’s more generous 540 shots. The FZ300 also has a weaker flash and the touted 5-axis image stabilization does not work in 4K video mode. The video audio is not as good as the FZ200 out in even moderately light, breezy conditions.
This is NOT to suggest that it isn’t an excellent camera in its class: It is. So is the FZ200, my most-used camera over the last two years. If the added features are what you want, then so be it. The same identical lens and same, identical small sensor just means the same stills. This “upgrade” has obvious battery life, weight, bulk, flash unit, audio, and price downgrades all included . . . unfortunately, at extra charge.
25 of 25 people found the following review helpful.
With fewer frills would be a 5 star camera
By Richard Ries
Long gone are the days where I had to lug a DSLR, multiple lenses and flashes in order to get good photos for clients. (I serve the construction market.) Enthusiast-level cameras do a great job and this one cost a fraction of what I spent on my last lens. While many clients are content with the photos they get from their iPhones, that’s not what I want to deliver. In order to provide the quality I believe differentiates my services I need the control of a DSLR but I want the the compact size, low cost, and light weight of a great point-and-shoot.Here’s what I love about this camera:
>The ability to shoot shutter priority, aperture priority, full manual, or full auto (with consistently good results in auto)
>Fast, quiet autofocus and zoom
>Tilt and swivel touch-screen monitor
>Very good 4k video
>A decent built-in, variable-output flash and a hotshoe
>The ability to shoot RAW
>A decent built-in mic and a jack (the sound quality is very good with the built-in mic although production audio rarely makes it to the finish)
>Quick cold starts and near-zero latency on the shutter
The only thing I truly dislike is the thumbwheel focus. It’s slow, badly placed, makes pull focus and follow focus nearly impossible (although the auto follow focus does a good job), and after a half-century of shooting I can’t stop reaching for the barrel of the lens.
I also wish they’d allocated costs differently. For some reason makers of enthusiast-level cameras think they need to pack their products with features that I find useless. Maybe their market demands these gimmicks but I hate ’em. Scene modes. Color balance. Drive modes. Then they slather on buttons and menus so that, in theory, you can access and manipulate all these options. I find them a hindrance. I wish they’d spent their money on a faster lens, a larger sensor, and better dynamic range. Overall I like this camera a lot and it will serve my commercial and personal needs very well. But it could be better, much better, with fewer frills. I’ve included some images from when I was first playing with the camera. The food shot from Patti’s 1880s Settlement in Grand Rivers KY was shot at f2.8, 1/50, ISO 3200, no flash, in Intelligent Auto. The shot of Cave Run Lake (KY) was at f4, 1/320, ISO 100, Intelligent Auto. The picture of the church in downtown Kingsport, TN was shot at f2.8, 1/20, ISO 4000 in Intelligent Auto.
Features of this product
- Capture moments with superb 4K imaging performance in both video and exclusive 4K PHOTO
- 24X (25-600mm) full-range F2.8 aperture Leica Lens
- Worry-free splash proof / dustproof body
- 5 Axis Hybrid Optical Image Stabilization assures steady photos and videos
- 12.1-megapixel high sensitivity MOS sensor achieves superb low light image quality
Today, I’m not going to tell you that you can take better images with a point and shoot camera than you can with an DIGITAL CAMERA. But, I’m not going to inform you that you aren’t take good images with them either. If a point and shoot has an aperture priority, shutter release priority, or a hands-on shooting mode, you will have some pretty good control over what the image will look like. But, even if it doesn’t have custom shooting modes, you can still get favorable results. After all, there are groups of photographers that pride themselves on getting great images using only their cellphone cameras.
That’s the whole thing you have to know concerning this product. With such a comprehensive input, you’ll receive more than enough guideline so there’s not a single chance to result in the wrong decision. Don’t forget that best valued one isn’t often be the most cost effective one. Price won’t be described as a problem when it meets your decision. Off course, you are the one to decide of course , if your final decision due to this product is a no, we have now reviews for one more products on the same category. There’s possibility you can find what exactly you need from one of them. Many thanks and also have a fantastic day!